Since when did teen pregnancy become cool?
Uh, teen pregnancy is a reality but we don’t have to market it as cool. Pregnancy is beautiful when people are prepared to have babies. Or for some people who have been surprised and ended up having a baby because of circumstances, it’s a beautiful thing when they learn from the experience and enjoy the experience. But it’s not something that you say is cool just because you want to be a popular kid in school. I think that pregnancy is serious business because unlike toys, babies are real and they have real needs that have to be met. Even as a fetus, it has needs. Nourishment is one. And of course, the pre-natal check-ups. And acceptance from the parents as well as the people surrounding its parents.
I don’t know the goal of the toy maker. Maybe they want children to accept teen pregnancy as a fact of life? But to say it’s so cool — I think they have to review their taglines and stuff.
Debunked Hysteria of the Day: The Daily Mail, The Daily Telegraph, and several other heavy-breathed British publications would have you believe that the European Union has just ruled that water cannot prevent dehydration.
Well, it has. But the ruling is not nearly as ludicrous as it is being made out to be.
First, a little background: A pair of German scientists, Drs. Andreas Hahn and Moritz Hagenmeyer, submitted an ostensibly irrefutable claim [pdf] to the European Food Standards Authority — that drinking water “can reduce the risk…of dehydration” — in order to prove that EU laws preventing food manufactures from labeling products with health claims not approved by the EU were too strict.
Here is why this is not a repeat of “pizza is a vegetable”:
For one thing, as Guardian science writer Martin Robbins points out, merely drinking water doesn’t prevent dehydration. “If I drink half a pint of bottled water while running through a desert in the blistering sun, I’ll still end up dehydrated,” says Robbins, “and if I drink several bottles today, that won’t prevent me from dehydrating tomorrow.”
Bottled water manufacturers shouldn’t be allowed to claim on their packaging that their products prevent dehydration because that’s simply not true.
Another thing worth noting is that the only two people outside the scientist behind the claim quoted in both the Mail and the Telegraph articles, Tory MEP Roger Helmer and UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall, are known Eurosceptics with a fairly obvious agenda.
The EFSA did rule that “drinking water is good for normal physical and cognitive functions and normal thermoregulation,” which was good enough for the British Soft Drinks Association.
TL;DR: Sometimes you have to read a little bit more to get the whole story.
We need laws better than this one
Seriously, lawmakers need to think about more important things like better education, laws that would encourage businesses, etc. So what if a couple would like to use those devices? It’s up to them to decide what they do in their own homes and time. If they’re so worried about kids getting those devices, make them show IDs (which could be faked but that would also mean people would have to make an effort to get them first before buying the said toys, etc.) or something. And if they are seriously to ban any device that “can be used to stimulate human genitals,” “could trigger sexually impure ideas” or “can give room to sex-related offenses” that means almost anything and maybe even everything should be banned. This is just so silly. They should worry more about having to catch people abusing the law not making up stupid laws.“This is also in keeping with the policy of the state to value the dignity of every human person and to promote and safeguard its integrity and the moral, spiritual and social being of its citizenry from the pernicious effects of obscene devices,” Velarde added.
Tieng and Velarde defined sex toys as any device that “can be used to stimulate human genitals,” “could trigger sexually impure ideas” or “can give room to sex-related offenses.”
Private folk earning P.5M must file SALN by April 15
While I am ok with having to pay taxes, this is just too much for regular folks who have to pay rent, pay the bills, feed themselves (and their children/kin), etc. To think that people give practically 30% of their earnings to the government taxes, etc already, this is just too much. I think that the SALN could be abused later on, all things considered.
If they can’t catch the ‘big fish’ who are evading taxes big time, why penalize everyone else? Part of the reason why the big fish aren’t caught is that they let those big fish get away via bribery anyway. ~_~
Why is the man the rape victim? Why are they judging the girl as a slut?!
People like these sicken me

![thedailywhat:
Debunked Hysteria of the Day: The Daily Mail, The Daily Telegraph, and several other heavy-breathed British publications would have you believe that the European Union has just ruled that water cannot prevent dehydration.
Well, it has. But the ruling is not nearly as ludicrous as it is being made out to be.
First, a little background: A pair of German scientists, Drs. Andreas Hahn and Moritz Hagenmeyer, submitted an ostensibly irrefutable claim [pdf] to the European Food Standards Authority — that drinking water “can reduce the risk…of dehydration” — in order to prove that EU laws preventing food manufactures from labeling products with health claims not approved by the EU were too strict.
Here is why this is not a repeat of “pizza is a vegetable”:
For one thing, as Guardian science writer Martin Robbins points out, merely drinking water doesn’t prevent dehydration. “If I drink half a pint of bottled water while running through a desert in the blistering sun, I’ll still end up dehydrated,” says Robbins, “and if I drink several bottles today, that won’t prevent me from dehydrating tomorrow.”
Bottled water manufacturers shouldn’t be allowed to claim on their packaging that their products prevent dehydration because that’s simply not true.
Another thing worth noting is that the only two people outside the scientist behind the claim quoted in both the Mail and the Telegraph articles, Tory MEP Roger Helmer and UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall, are known Eurosceptics with a fairly obvious agenda.
The EFSA did rule that “drinking water is good for normal physical and cognitive functions and normal thermoregulation,” which was good enough for the British Soft Drinks Association.
TL;DR: Sometimes you have to read a little bit more to get the whole story.
[dailymail / telegraph / guardian.]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_luzfwnFRQg1qzpwi0o1_1280.jpg)









